The Trump administration ended De Minimis Clause: What is it? Why it should matter to you.
Reversing the De Minimis Clause
The De Minimis Clause: A Comprehensive Overview (Facing Significant Proposed Changes)
The de minimis clause, rooted in the Latin expression "de minimis non curat lex" ("the law does not concern itself with trifles") (1), has significant implications for international trade and various areas of law. This clause essentially establishes a threshold below which certain regulations or legal actions are deemed unnecessary or impractical. This article delves into the de minimis clause, exploring its importance, the reasons behind calls for its modification, and the potential impacts of a significant proposed rule change by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
What is the De Minimis Clause?
The de minimis clause has different applications in various legal and economic contexts. In the context of international trade, the de minimis clause, a provision of the Trade Enforcement and Trade Facilitation Act (2), allows goods valued below a certain threshold to enter a country duty-free and without undergoing formal customs procedures. In the United States, this threshold is currently set at $800 per person per day, meaning that shipments valued below this amount can be imported without paying duties or taxes (3). This exemption applies to various goods, including those purchased online from international sellers (4). It's important to note that the $800 threshold is a per-day limit, and attempts to circumvent this by splitting a single order into multiple shipments are prohibited (3).
Beyond international trade, the de minimis clause also appears in other areas of law. For example, in the context of company acquisitions, it is used to limit the vendor's liability to the buyer by setting a materiality threshold for claims. This helps avoid disputes over minor breaches of warranty (5). In tax law, it allows for the exclusion of small fringe benefits from an employee's taxable income (6). In contract law, it can be used to limit the application of covenants or restrictions when the impact of a breach is negligible (7).
Importance of the De Minimis Clause
The de minimis clause plays a crucial role in facilitating international trade and reducing administrative burdens, benefiting both businesses and consumers (8). By exempting low-value shipments from duties and customs procedures, it allows for faster and more affordable cross-border e-commerce (4). This is particularly beneficial for small businesses and those in remote areas who rely on e-commerce for access to goods (8). Studies have shown that the de minimis clause disproportionately benefits low-income households and minority groups by providing access to affordable goods (8).
For businesses engaged in business-to-business (B2B) transactions, the de minimis clause offers several advantages, including:
Faster clearance processes: This leads to quicker delivery of shipments to customers (2).
Greater savings: These savings can result in more competitive pricing for consumers (2).
Improved understanding of regulations: The clause simplifies import procedures and promotes compliance (2).
Elimination of border delays: This streamlines the import process and reduces lead times (2).
Reduced paperwork: This minimizes administrative burdens associated with customs procedures (2).
Lower costs for entering new markets: This facilitates international expansion for businesses (2).
The de minimis clause also helps to streamline customs operations by allowing customs officials to focus on higher-value shipments and potential security risks (2). This can lead to greater efficiency and improved compliance with customs regulations.
Furthermore, the de minimis rule incentivizes sellers to keep prices below the threshold to avoid duties and fees, which translates into lower prices for consumers (3). This can result in increased international trade and greater consumer choice.
Calls for Change and the Proposed CBP Rule
Despite its benefits, the de minimis clause has faced scrutiny and calls for its modification, particularly in the United States. Concerns have been raised about the potential for abuse of the exemption, with some arguing that it allows for the entry of counterfeit goods, unsafe products, and illicit drugs (9).
Moreover, some argue that the de minimis clause gives an unfair advantage to foreign e-commerce companies, particularly those based in China, allowing them to undercut U.S. businesses (10). This has led to calls for a reduction or elimination of the threshold, especially for imports from China and Russia (4).
Crucially, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has proposed a rule change that would significantly alter the application of the de minimis clause. Published on January 18, 2024, this proposed rule would exclude goods subject to Section 301 tariffs (which primarily target goods from China) from eligibility for de minimis treatment. This means that even low-value goods from China that are subject to Section 301 tariffs would have to go through formal customs entry and pay duties. This proposed change is a direct response to concerns about unfair competition and national security.
Potential Impacts of the Proposed CBP Rule (and Broader Changes)
The proposed CBP rule, and any broader reduction or elimination of the de minimis threshold, could have several potential impacts:
Costs and Prices:
Increased Costs for Consumers: Applying duties and taxes to a larger number of goods, particularly those from China affected by the proposed rule, would lead to higher prices for consumers (3). This could disproportionately affect low-income households who rely on affordable imports (3).
Increased Costs for Businesses: Businesses would face increased costs due to duties, taxes, and the need for formal customs procedures (11). These costs could be passed on to consumers or absorbed by businesses, potentially impacting profitability.
Administrative Burden and Efficiency:
Increased Administrative Burden: Businesses would face increased administrative costs and complexity as they would need to file formal customs entries for more shipments (11). This could be particularly challenging for small businesses with limited resources.
Slower Shipping Times: Increased customs scrutiny and processing could lead to delays in shipping times, potentially impacting customer satisfaction and supply chain efficiency (12).
Supply Chains and Trade:
Shift in Supply Chains: Businesses may be incentivized to onshore or nearshore their operations to avoid higher import costs (11). This could lead to changes in global trade patterns and potentially impact domestic manufacturing.
Potential for Retaliation: Other countries could retaliate by eliminating or reducing their own de minimis thresholds, potentially harming U.S. exporters (3).
Historical Context
The de minimis clause in the United States has a long history, dating back to the Tariff Act of 1930 (2). Initially, the threshold was set at $1 to avoid excessive administrative burdens on low-value imports (13). Over the years, the threshold has been gradually increased to its current level of $800, reflecting changing economic conditions, trade policies, and the rise of e-commerce (13). The most recent significant increase in the *de minimis* threshold occurred in 2016 under the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act (4). This was intended to facilitate trade and reduce costs for businesses and consumers. However, the increased volume of *de minimis* shipments also raised concerns about enforcement and security (2). Raising the threshold has allowed customs authorities to concentrate on higher-value shipments and enhance compliance by redirecting resources from low-value imports (2). The COVID-19 pandemic further solidified the reliance on the *de minimis* exemption for international e-commerce as consumers increasingly turned to online shopping for goods (4). This surge in e-commerce highlighted the importance of the *de minimis* clause in facilitating cross-border trade and ensuring access to goods. ## De Minimis in Other Countries The United States has a relatively high *de minimis* threshold compared to other countries. This can be seen in the following table: | Country | De Minimis Threshold ($) | | :-------------- | :------------------------ | | United States | 800 | | Australia | 660.95 | | European Union | 164.27 | | Mexico | 51.39 | | Canada | 14.57 | | China | 6.98 |
(4)
This difference in thresholds reflects varying trade policies and priorities among countries. While a higher threshold benefits consumers in the U.S. by allowing for more duty-free imports, it has also raised concerns about potential competitive disadvantages for domestic businesses and increased security risks. It's important to note that these values can fluctuate with exchange rates and policy changes.
Parties Advocating for Change:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): CBP officials have expressed concerns about the challenges in screening the increasing volume of de minimis shipments for illegal or unsafe goods (14), and have taken concrete steps towards modifying the rule.
Members of Congress: Some members of Congress have introduced bills aimed at reducing or eliminating the de minimis threshold, particularly for imports from China and Russia (4). These proposals are often driven by concerns about national security, unfair competition, and the influx of illicit drugs. Recent examples include the "Import Security and Fairness Act."
Domestic Manufacturers: Some U.S. manufacturers argue that the de minimis clause gives an unfair advantage to foreign competitors, harming domestic industries (11). Groups like the National Council of Textile Organizations have actively lobbied for changes.
Expert Opinions and Analysis
Experts have offered various perspectives on the potential impacts of modifying or eliminating the de minimis clause. Some argue that it would lead to significant costs for consumers and taxpayers, potentially outweighing any benefits (17). For example, a study by Oxford Economics estimated that implementing certain proposals to weaken the de minimis exemption could cost the government more than the revenue it generates (17). This highlights the potential financial implications and the need for careful consideration of the costs and benefits.
Others suggest that modifying the de minimis clause could create a more level playing field for U.S. businesses and improve product safety (9). By reducing or eliminating the duty-free exemption, domestic manufacturers could become more competitive with foreign companies, potentially leading to increased domestic production and job creation.
Synthesis and Conclusion
The de minimis clause is a subject of significant debate and potential change. Proponents highlight its benefits for trade facilitation and consumer choice, while opponents raise concerns about unfair competition, security risks, and lost revenue. The proposed CBP rule change represents a major potential shift in U.S. trade policy, specifically targeting imports from China.
While increased enforcement and scrutiny of low-value imports may be necessary to address security and safety concerns, policymakers need to carefully consider the potential costs and trade-offs associated with such changes. The proposed rule, if implemented, would lead to higher prices for many goods imported from China, increase administrative burdens for businesses, and potentially disrupt supply chains. This could disproportionately impact low-income households and small businesses.
Ultimately, a balanced approach that considers the needs of various stakeholders, including consumers, businesses, and customs officials, is essential. Policymakers need to weigh the potential benefits of increased enforcement and revenue collection against the potential costs and economic impacts. This includes considering the potential for retaliation from other countries and the need to promote fair trade practices in the global economy. The situation is dynamic, and the future of the de minimis clause in the U.S. remains uncertain, pending the outcome of the proposed rule-making process and potential further legislative action.
1. De minimis - Wikipedia, accessed February 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_minimis
2. From Past to Present: A Historical Overview of Section 321 and Its Influence on Customs Compliance, accessed February 5, 2025, https://customscity.com/from-past-to-present-a-historical-overview-of-section-321-and-its-influence-on-customs-compliance/
3. Destroying De Minimis - AAF - The American Action Forum, accessed February 5, 2025, https://www.americanactionforum.org/research/destroying-de-minimis/
4. What would the demise of de minimis mean for supply chains?, accessed February 5, 2025, https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/de-minimis-exemption-changes-supply-chain-impact/724110/
5. M&A Vocabulary – Explained by the experts: Limitation of liability (de minimis, basket, cap) | Rödl & Partner, accessed February 5, 2025, https://www.roedl.com/insights/ma-dialog/2020-05/ma-vocabulary-limitation-of-liability-de-minimis-basket-cap
6. De minimis fringe benefits | Internal Revenue Service, accessed February 5, 2025, https://www.irs.gov/government-entities/federal-state-local-governments/de-minimis-fringe-benefits
7. De Minimis - Westlaw, accessed February 5, 2025, https://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I21061805ef0811e28578f7ccc38dcbee?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29
8. De Minimis: A Vital Tax Exemption - National Foreign Trade Council, accessed February 5, 2025, https://www.nftc.org/de-minimis-a-vital-tax-exemption/
9. Dropshipping Loophole To Be Closed? The De Minimis Rule - AutoDS, accessed February 5, 2025, https://www.autods.com/blog/dropshipping-tips-strategies/dropshipping-loophole/
10. De minimis loophole closed: How Trump's tariff will target Chinese companies like Shein? 10-point explainer - The Economic Times, accessed February 5, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/us-news-trump-tariff-china-canada-mexico-de-minimis-loophole-closed-how-trumps-tariff-will-target-chinese-companies-like-shein-10-point-explainer/articleshow/117892262.cms
11. The De Minimis Rule: Understanding the Impact of Proposed Changes - Rooney Law, accessed February 5, 2025, https://rooney.law/blog/the-de-minimis-rule-understanding-the-impact-of-proposed-changes/
12. Section 321 Suspended: What It Means for Ecommerce Businesses and Global Trade | DCL Logistics, accessed February 5, 2025, https://dclcorp.com/blog/shipping/section-321-suspended-what-it-means-for-e-commerce-and-global-trade/
13. Imports and the Section 321 (De Minimis) Exemption: Origins, Evolution, and Use - CRS Reports, accessed February 5, 2025, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R48380
14. CBP proposes rule that would eliminate Section 321 de minimis exemption eligibility for shipments subject to Section 301 tariffs | DLA Piper, accessed February 5, 2025, https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2025/01/cbp-proposes-rule-that-would-eliminate-section-321
15. So Are We Done with De Minimis or Not? - Shipfusion, accessed February 5, 2025, https://www.shipfusion.com/blog/de-minimis-shipping
16. De minimis exemption changes are coming: Is your business ready - Avalara, accessed February 5, 2025, https://www.avalara.com/blog/en/north-america/2024/11/de-minimis-exemption-changes-coming.html
17. Study: Weakening De Minimis Would Require Billions in New Congressional Spending, accessed February 5, 2025, https://www.nftc.org/study-weakening-de-minimis-would-require-billions-in-new-congressional-spending/